4th November 2020
Curtis Banks: Staveley update
On 19 August the Supreme Court judgment in the Staveley inheritance tax case was released, bringing the case to a close six years after the First Tier Tribunal ruling. We’ve highlighted the key points below, and you can click here to read a more detailed analysis and the background to the case.
- Omission to take pension benefits: Mrs Staveley’s decision not to access her pension funds did create an inheritance tax liability – however, this shouldn’t affect recent cases following a rule change in 2011
- Transferring while in ill-health: Mrs Staveley’s decision to transfer her pension weeks before her death has not created an inheritance tax liability
- The judgment clarifies when actions can be considered together as a series of transactions to confer benefits
- The judgment questions whether death benefits can be conferred as part of a pension transfer, as beneficiaries don’t have any benefits or rights while the pension holder is alive
- The judgment appears to question whether a pension transfer would always be a transfer of value, by rejecting HMRC’s ‘return to zero’ approach.
Click here to sign up to our mailing list to receive future updates and insights.

Not yet registered?
Please complete this form to join our community